White Crisp vs Organic Blonde Chocolate
Overall, White Crisp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | White Crisp | Organic Blonde Chocolate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 484 kcal | 605 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 43.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 26.3 g |
| Sugars | 9 g | 45.1 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 30 g | 7.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- White Crisp has 20% fewer calories (484 kcal vs 605 kcal).
- White Crisp has 33% less fat (29 g vs 43.4 g).
- White Crisp has 32% less saturated fat (18 g vs 26.3 g).
- White Crisp has 80% less sugar (9 g vs 45.1 g).
- White Crisp has 100% more fiber (5 g vs 0 g).
- White Crisp has 74% more protein (30 g vs 7.9 g).
- White Crisp has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Organic Blonde Chocolate lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
White Crisp
Not available.
Organic Blonde Chocolate
Organic Cane Sugar, Organic Cocoa Butter, Organic Whole Milk Powder, Organic Caramelised Sugar Powder, Emulsifier: Organic Lecithins (Soya); Sea Salt*, Natural Caramel Flavouring*, Organic Vanilla Extract.
FAQ
Which is healthier: White Crisp or Organic Blonde Chocolate?
Overall, White Crisp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
White Crisp has fewer calories: 484 kcal versus 605 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
White Crisp has less sugar: 9 g versus 45.1 g per 100 g.