Comparison

White Crisp vs Chocolat Villars Blanc 100g

Overall, White Crisp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWhite CrispChocolat Villars Blanc 100g
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 484 kcal 575 kcal
Fat 29 g 38 g
Saturated fat 18 g 23 g
Sugars 9 g 52 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.3 g
Fiber 5 g 0 g
Protein 30 g 7 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • White Crisp has 16% fewer calories (484 kcal vs 575 kcal).
  • White Crisp has 24% less fat (29 g vs 38 g).
  • White Crisp has 22% less saturated fat (18 g vs 23 g).
  • White Crisp has 83% less sugar (9 g vs 52 g).
  • White Crisp has 100% more fiber (5 g vs 0 g).
  • White Crisp has 77% more protein (30 g vs 7 g).
  • White Crisp has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Chocolat Villars Blanc 100g lists: Milk.

Ingredients

White Crisp

Not available.

Chocolat Villars Blanc 100g

Sucre*, beurre de cacao, LAIT* entier en poudre, fraction de BEURRE*, émulsifiant (lécithine de Colza), graines de vanille, arôme naturel de vanille. Cacao : 29% minimum. Peut contenir des traces de NOISETTE, AMANDE, NOIX, NOIX DE PECAN, NOIX DE CAJOU, PISTACHE, OEUF, BLE, SOJA et ORGE. *Ingrédients d'origine suisse.

FAQ

Which is healthier: White Crisp or Chocolat Villars Blanc 100g?

Overall, White Crisp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

White Crisp has fewer calories: 484 kcal versus 575 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

White Crisp has less sugar: 9 g versus 52 g per 100 g.

More comparisons