Weiße Schokolade vs Rocher coco
Overall, Weiße Schokolade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Weiße Schokolade | Rocher coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 539 kcal | 598 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 41 g |
| Saturated fat | 18.5 g | 26 g |
| Sugars | 59.4 g | 52 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Süßmolken pulver | Milk, Soybeans, Lécithine de soja, Poudre de lait |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Weiße Schokolade has 27% less fat (30 g vs 41 g).
- Weiße Schokolade has 29% less saturated fat (18.5 g vs 26 g).
- Rocher coco has 12% less sugar (52 g vs 59.4 g).
- Weiße Schokolade has 29% more protein (7.2 g vs 5.1 g).
- Only Weiße Schokolade lists: Gluten, Süßmolken pulver.
- Only Rocher coco lists: Soybeans, Lécithine de soja, Poudre de lait.
Ingredients
Weiße Schokolade
Zucker, Kakaobutter, 18% Vollmilchpulver, 6% Sahnepulver, Süßmolkenpulver, Laktose, Emulgator: Lecithine; Vanilleextrakt. Kann Spuren von Gluten, Soja, Schalenfrüchten und Erdnüssen enthalten.
Rocher coco
Sucre, beurre de cacao, poudre de lait, beurre laitier concentré, lactose, noix de coco caramélisée 4% (noix de coco, sucre), émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), arôme naturel, arôme. Peut contenir du blé, des noisettes, des amandes et d'autres fruits à coque.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Weiße Schokolade or Rocher coco?
Overall, Weiße Schokolade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Weiße Schokolade has fewer calories: 539 kcal versus 598 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rocher coco has less sugar: 52 g versus 59.4 g per 100 g.