Comparison

Rocher coco vs Chocolate blanco

Overall, Chocolate blanco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRocher cocoChocolate blanco
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 598 kcal 556 kcal
Fat 41 g 34 g
Saturated fat 26 g 20 g
Sugars 52 g 56 g
Salt 0.2 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 5.1 g 6.6 g
Additives21
AllergensMilk, Soybeans, Lécithine de soja, Poudre de laitMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chocolate blanco has 17% less fat (34 g vs 41 g).
  • Chocolate blanco has 23% less saturated fat (20 g vs 26 g).
  • Chocolate blanco has 23% more protein (6.6 g vs 5.1 g).
  • Only Rocher coco lists: Soybeans, Lécithine de soja, Poudre de lait.

Ingredients

Rocher coco

Sucre, beurre de cacao, poudre de lait, beurre laitier concentré, lactose, noix de coco caramélisée 4% (noix de coco, sucre), émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), arôme naturel, arôme. Peut contenir du blé, des noisettes, des amandes et d'autres fruits à coque.

Chocolate blanco

Açúcar, manteiga de cacau, LEITE em pó, soro de LEITE em pó, materia gorda LÁCTEA anidra, emulsionante (lecitinas), aroma (vanilina). ALERGÉNIOS: Contém leite. Pode conter soja e frutos de casca rija. CONSERVAR EN LUGAR FRESCO, SECO Y ALEJADO DE OLORES.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rocher coco or Chocolate blanco?

Overall, Chocolate blanco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chocolate blanco has fewer calories: 556 kcal versus 598 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rocher coco has less sugar: 52 g versus 56 g per 100 g.

More comparisons