Comparison

Roasted Seaweed Snack vs Dashima Kelp Chips Bugak

Overall, Dashima Kelp Chips Bugak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRoasted Seaweed SnackDashima Kelp Chips Bugak
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 600 kcal 500 kcal
Fat 40 g 28 g
Saturated fat 0 g 3 g
Sugars 0 g 2 g
Salt 2.3 g 0.5 g
Fiber 20 g 10 g
Protein 20 g 8 g
Additives00
AllergensSesame seedsSesame seeds

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Dashima Kelp Chips Bugak has 17% fewer calories (500 kcal vs 600 kcal).
  • Dashima Kelp Chips Bugak has 30% less fat (28 g vs 40 g).
  • Roasted Seaweed Snack has no saturated fat, while Dashima Kelp Chips Bugak has 3 g.
  • Roasted Seaweed Snack has no sugar, while Dashima Kelp Chips Bugak has 2 g.
  • Dashima Kelp Chips Bugak has 76% less salt (0.5 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Roasted Seaweed Snack has 50% more fiber (20 g vs 10 g).
  • Roasted Seaweed Snack has 60% more protein (20 g vs 8 g).
  • Dashima Kelp Chips Bugak has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Roasted Seaweed Snack

SEAWEED, EXPELLER PRESSED CANOLA OIL, SESAME OIL, SEA SALT

Dashima Kelp Chips Bugak

Kelp (dashima), Glutinous rice, High oleic sunflower oil, Sesame seed, Sugar, Sea salt, Onion powder, Kelp powder, Varech (dashima), Riz collant, Huile de tournesol à haute teneur en acide oléique, Graines de sésame, Sucre, Sel de mer, Poudre d'oignon, Poudre d'algues

FAQ

Which is healthier: Roasted Seaweed Snack or Dashima Kelp Chips Bugak?

Overall, Dashima Kelp Chips Bugak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dashima Kelp Chips Bugak has fewer calories: 500 kcal versus 600 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Roasted Seaweed Snack has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons