Comparison

Roasted Chicken Base vs Vegetable stock pot

Overall, Vegetable stock pot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRoasted Chicken BaseVegetable stock pot
Nutri-Score — c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 250 kcal 5 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 16.7 g 0.2 g
Salt 14.6 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0 g 0.1 g
Protein 16.7 g 0.2 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedCelery

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Vegetable stock pot has 98% fewer calories (5 kcal vs 250 kcal).
  • Roasted Chicken Base has no fat, while Vegetable stock pot has 0.3 g.
  • Vegetable stock pot has 99% less sugar (0.2 g vs 16.7 g).
  • Vegetable stock pot has 94% less salt (0.9 g vs 14.6 g).
  • Roasted Chicken Base has 99% more protein (16.7 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Only Vegetable stock pot lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Roasted Chicken Base

Roasted chicken, maltodextrin, salt, chicken stock, cane sugar, food starch, yeast extract, flavoring, turmeric, natural flavors.

Vegetable stock pot

CONCENTRATED VEGETABLE STOCK (63%) (Water, Dried Celeriac, Dried Carrot, Red Pepper Powder, Carrot Powder, Dried Onion, Celery Seeds, Dried Leek, Dried Celery, Dried Cabbage), Salt, Flavourings (contain Celery), Sunflower Oil, Yeast Extract, Gelling Agents: Agar, Xanthan Gum; Sugar, Turmeric Powder, Dried Parsley, Acidity Regulator: Lactic Acid; Lovage Powder, Black Pepper, Nutmeg Powder. ALLERGY ADVICE:

FAQ

Which is healthier: Roasted Chicken Base or Vegetable stock pot?

Overall, Vegetable stock pot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Vegetable stock pot has fewer calories: 5 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Vegetable stock pot has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 16.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons