Riz long parfumé vs Snacks Pois chiches
Overall, Riz long parfumé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz long parfumé | Snacks Pois chiches |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 353 kcal | 498 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 4.8 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 8.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Crustaceans, Gluten, Milk, Peanuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz long parfumé has 29% fewer calories (353 kcal vs 498 kcal).
- Riz long parfumé has 98% less fat (0.5 g vs 26 g).
- Riz long parfumé has 95% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2 g).
- Riz long parfumé has 64% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Riz long parfumé has 100% less salt (0 g vs 2.1 g).
- Snacks Pois chiches has 79% more fiber (4.8 g vs 1 g).
- Snacks Pois chiches has 25% more protein (8.9 g vs 6.7 g).
- Riz long parfumé has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Snacks Pois chiches lists: Crustaceans, Gluten, Milk, Peanuts.
Ingredients
Riz long parfumé
100% riz long blanc. Origine : voir au dos du sachet (C = Cambodge, T = Thaïlande, V = Vietnam)
Snacks Pois chiches
Farine de pois chiches* 40%, amidon*, huile de tournesol*, farine de pommes de terre*, sel. *biologiques Traces éventuelles d'arachides, lait, céréales contenant du gluten et crustacés.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz long parfumé or Snacks Pois chiches?
Overall, Riz long parfumé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz long parfumé has fewer calories: 353 kcal versus 498 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz long parfumé has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.