Riz au lait nature vs Riz au lait
Overall, Riz au lait nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz au lait nature | Riz au lait |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 121 kcal | 127 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 4.4 g | 3.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz au lait has 19% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.1 g).
- Riz au lait nature has 92% less sugar (1 g vs 12 g).
- Riz au lait nature has 23% more protein (4.4 g vs 3.4 g).
- Riz au lait nature has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Riz au lait lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Riz au lait nature
Not available.
Riz au lait
_Lait_ entier 77%, riz 10%, sucre, amidon de riz, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz au lait nature or Riz au lait?
Overall, Riz au lait nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz au lait nature has fewer calories: 121 kcal versus 127 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz au lait nature has less sugar: 1 g versus 12 g per 100 g.