Comparison

Riz au lait nature vs Riz au lait entier 2x130g CC

Overall, Riz au lait nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRiz au lait natureRiz au lait entier 2x130g CC
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group — 3
Calories 121 kcal 141 kcal
Fat 3 g 6 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 3.9 g
Sugars 1 g 12 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 0.1 g
Protein 4.4 g 3.2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Riz au lait nature has 14% fewer calories (121 kcal vs 141 kcal).
  • Riz au lait nature has 50% less fat (3 g vs 6 g).
  • Riz au lait nature has 46% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Riz au lait nature has 92% less sugar (1 g vs 12 g).
  • Riz au lait nature has 27% more protein (4.4 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Riz au lait nature has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Riz au lait entier 2x130g CC lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Riz au lait nature

Not available.

Riz au lait entier 2x130g CC

Lait entier de vache* 83,6% (France), riz de Camargue IGP rond blanc* 8,6% (France), sucre de canne blond* *Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique

FAQ

Which is healthier: Riz au lait nature or Riz au lait entier 2x130g CC?

Overall, Riz au lait nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Riz au lait nature has fewer calories: 121 kcal versus 141 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Riz au lait nature has less sugar: 1 g versus 12 g per 100 g.

More comparisons