Comparison

Riz au lait nature vs Rice Pudding classic

Overall, Riz au lait nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Better choice
Riz au lait nature

Riz au lait nature

Malo
b
Rice Pudding classic

Rice Pudding classic

Milkeria
c

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRiz au lait natureRice Pudding classic
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group — —
Calories 121 kcal 109 kcal
Fat 3 g 2.4 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 1.6 g
Sugars 1 g 9.3 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Protein 4.4 g 3.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rice Pudding classic has 20% less fat (2.4 g vs 3 g).
  • Rice Pudding classic has 24% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Riz au lait nature has 89% less sugar (1 g vs 9.3 g).
  • Riz au lait nature has 23% more protein (4.4 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Riz au lait nature has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Riz au lait nature

Not available.

Rice Pudding classic

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Riz au lait nature or Rice Pudding classic?

Overall, Riz au lait nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rice Pudding classic has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 121 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Riz au lait nature has less sugar: 1 g versus 9.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Riz au lait nature vs Riz Au Lait Nature 2X100... Rice Pudding classic vs Rice Pudding Riz au lait nature vs Rice Pudding Riz au lait entier 2x130... vs Rice Pudding classic Riz au lait nature vs Riz au lait entier 2x130... Authentic Rice Pudding vs Rice Pudding classic Authentic Rice Pudding vs Riz au lait nature Riz au lait vs Rice Pudding classic