Riz au lait vs Riz au lait entier 2x130g CC
Overall, Riz au lait has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz au lait | Riz au lait entier 2x130g CC |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 127 kcal | 141 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 3.9 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 3.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz au lait has 53% less fat (2.8 g vs 6 g).
- Riz au lait has 56% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 3.9 g).
- Riz au lait has 80% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
Ingredients
Riz au lait
_Lait_ entier 77%, riz 10%, sucre, amidon de riz, sel.
Riz au lait entier 2x130g CC
Lait entier de vache* 83,6% (France), riz de Camargue IGP rond blanc* 8,6% (France), sucre de canne blond* *Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz au lait or Riz au lait entier 2x130g CC?
Overall, Riz au lait has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz au lait has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 141 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz au lait has less sugar: 12 g versus 12 g per 100 g.