Comparison

Riz à la méditerranéenne au micro-ondes vs Trio de riz

Overall, Trio de riz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRiz à la méditerranéenne au...Trio de riz
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 177 kcal 174 kcal
Fat 2.9 g 1.6 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.6 g
Sugars 2.4 g 0 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.7 g
Fiber 2.6 g 2.4 g
Protein 4.2 g 3.6 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Trio de riz has 45% less fat (1.6 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Riz à la méditerranéenne au micro-ondes has 50% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Trio de riz has no sugar, while Riz à la méditerranéenne au micro-ondes has 2.4 g.
  • Riz à la méditerranéenne au micro-ondes has 14% more protein (4.2 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Trio de riz is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Riz à la méditerranéenne au micro-ondes

Riz long grain cuit 82%, tomate 12%, huile de tournesol, bouillon (sel, extraits de levures, dextrose, amidon de pomme de terre, extrait d'oignon, carotte, extraits d'épices et d'aromates, colorant naturel : extrait de curcuma), sucre, sel, colorant naturel : extrait de paprika; aromates (origan, romarin, basilic, thym), ail.

Trio de riz

Eau, riz* long blanc étuvé 32,7%, riz* rouge complet précuit 14,5%, riz* noir étuvé précuit 7,3%, huile d'olive* extra vierge, sel de mer. *Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Riz à la méditerranéenne au micro-ondes or Trio de riz?

Overall, Trio de riz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Trio de riz has fewer calories: 174 kcal versus 177 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Trio de riz has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons