Comparison

Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli di siena

Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRicciarelliRicciarelli di siena
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — 3
Calories 420 kcal 464 kcal
Fat 13 g 24 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 3.7 g
Sugars 41 g 51 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 9.2 g 10 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedEggs, Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ricciarelli has 46% less fat (13 g vs 24 g).
  • Ricciarelli has 76% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Ricciarelli has 20% less sugar (41 g vs 51 g).
  • Ricciarelli has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Ricciarelli di siena lists: Eggs, Nuts.

Ingredients

Ricciarelli

Not available.

Ricciarelli di siena

Mandorle 45%, Zucchero, Albume d'Uovo, Miele, Agente Lievitante (Carbonato acido d'Ammonio), Conservante: Acido Sorbico.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ricciarelli or Ricciarelli di siena?

Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ricciarelli has fewer calories: 420 kcal versus 464 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ricciarelli has less sugar: 41 g versus 51 g per 100 g.

More comparisons