Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricciarelli | Ricciarelli di Siena IGP |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 420 kcal | 464 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 41 g | 49 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 4.1 g |
| Protein | 9.2 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricciarelli has 46% less fat (13 g vs 24 g).
- Ricciarelli has 53% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.9 g).
- Ricciarelli has 16% less sugar (41 g vs 49 g).
- Ricciarelli di Siena IGP has 16% more protein (11 g vs 9.2 g).
- Ricciarelli has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Ricciarelli di Siena IGP lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Ricciarelli
Not available.
Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
45% sucre, sucre glace (sucre, amidon de maïs), blanc d'œuf, miel toutes fleurs, arômes, conservateur: acide sorbique, poudre à lever: carbonate acid d'ammonium vanilline
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricciarelli or Ricciarelli di Siena IGP?
Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricciarelli has fewer calories: 420 kcal versus 464 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricciarelli has less sugar: 41 g versus 49 g per 100 g.