Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli alla mandorla
Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricciarelli | Ricciarelli alla mandorla |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 420 kcal | 467 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 41 g | 47 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 7.1 g |
| Protein | 9.2 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricciarelli has 10% fewer calories (420 kcal vs 467 kcal).
- Ricciarelli has 48% less fat (13 g vs 25 g).
- Ricciarelli has 57% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 2.1 g).
- Ricciarelli has 13% less sugar (41 g vs 47 g).
- Only Ricciarelli alla mandorla lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Ricciarelli
Not available.
Ricciarelli alla mandorla
Mandorle 45% - zucchero - zucchero a velo 7% (zucchero, amido di mais) - albume d'uova fresche da galline allevate a terra-fibra solubile di cicoria: oligofruttosio-aromi-conservante: acido sorbico - agente lievitante: carbonato acido di ammonio sale.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricciarelli or Ricciarelli alla mandorla?
Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricciarelli has fewer calories: 420 kcal versus 467 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricciarelli has less sugar: 41 g versus 47 g per 100 g.