Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli Mandorla
Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricciarelli | Ricciarelli Mandorla |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 420 kcal | 452 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 41 g | 51 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 6.6 g |
| Protein | 9.2 g | 9.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricciarelli has 41% less fat (13 g vs 22 g).
- Ricciarelli has 50% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.8 g).
- Ricciarelli has 20% less sugar (41 g vs 51 g).
- Only Ricciarelli Mandorla lists: Eggs, Nuts.
Ingredients
Ricciarelli
Not available.
Ricciarelli Mandorla
Zucchero - mandorle 40% - zucchero a velo 7% (zucchero, amido di mais) - fibra solubile di cicoria - albume d'uovo - aromi - conservante: acido sorbico - agente lievitante: carbonato acido di ammonio - sale.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricciarelli or Ricciarelli Mandorla?
Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricciarelli has fewer calories: 420 kcal versus 452 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricciarelli has less sugar: 41 g versus 51 g per 100 g.