Ricciarelli Mandorla vs Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
Overall, Ricciarelli Mandorla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricciarelli Mandorla | Ricciarelli di Siena IGP |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 452 kcal | 464 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 51 g | 49 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 6.6 g | 4.1 g |
| Protein | 9.3 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Nuts | Eggs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricciarelli Mandorla has 38% more fiber (6.6 g vs 4.1 g).
- Ricciarelli di Siena IGP has 15% more protein (11 g vs 9.3 g).
- Ricciarelli Mandorla has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Ricciarelli Mandorla lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Ricciarelli Mandorla
Zucchero - mandorle 40% - zucchero a velo 7% (zucchero, amido di mais) - fibra solubile di cicoria - albume d'uovo - aromi - conservante: acido sorbico - agente lievitante: carbonato acido di ammonio - sale.
Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
45% sucre, sucre glace (sucre, amidon de maïs), blanc d'œuf, miel toutes fleurs, arômes, conservateur: acide sorbique, poudre à lever: carbonate acid d'ammonium vanilline
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricciarelli Mandorla or Ricciarelli di Siena IGP?
Overall, Ricciarelli Mandorla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricciarelli Mandorla has fewer calories: 452 kcal versus 464 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricciarelli di Siena IGP has less sugar: 49 g versus 51 g per 100 g.