Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricciarelli | Ricciarelli di Siena IGP |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 478 kcal | 464 kcal |
| Fat | 25.8 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 45.4 g | 49 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 5.1 g | 4.1 g |
| Protein | 12.4 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricciarelli di Siena IGP has 14% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 2.2 g).
- Ricciarelli has 20% more fiber (5.1 g vs 4.1 g).
- Ricciarelli has 11% more protein (12.4 g vs 11 g).
- Ricciarelli has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Ricciarelli di Siena IGP lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Ricciarelli
Not available.
Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
45% sucre, sucre glace (sucre, amidon de maïs), blanc d'œuf, miel toutes fleurs, arômes, conservateur: acide sorbique, poudre à lever: carbonate acid d'ammonium vanilline
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricciarelli or Ricciarelli di Siena IGP?
Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricciarelli di Siena IGP has fewer calories: 464 kcal versus 478 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricciarelli has less sugar: 45.4 g versus 49 g per 100 g.