Ricciarelli di Siena IGP vs Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricciarelli di Siena IGP | Ricciarelli di Siena IGP |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 464 kcal | 459 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 49 g | 49 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 4.1 g | — |
| Protein | 11 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Only Ricciarelli di Siena IGP lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
45% sucre, sucre glace (sucre, amidon de maïs), blanc d'œuf, miel toutes fleurs, arômes, conservateur: acide sorbique, poudre à lever: carbonate acid d'ammonium vanilline
Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricciarelli di Siena IGP or Ricciarelli di Siena IGP?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricciarelli di Siena IGP has fewer calories: 459 kcal versus 464 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricciarelli di Siena IGP has less sugar: 49 g versus 49 g per 100 g.