Ricciarelli Pistacchio vs Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
Overall, Ricciarelli Pistacchio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricciarelli Pistacchio | Ricciarelli di Siena IGP |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 476 kcal | 459 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 45 g | 49 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 7.9 g | — |
| Protein | 10 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricciarelli Pistacchio has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Ricciarelli Pistacchio lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Ricciarelli Pistacchio
Zucchero, mandorle 34%, pistacchio tostato 11%, zucchero a velo 7% (zucchero, amido di mais), fibra solubile di dicoria, albume d'uovа fresche pastorizzate da allevamento a terra, aromi, conservante: acido sorbico, agente lievitante: carbonato acido di ammonio, sale. Può contenere frumento, latte, soia e altra frutta a guscio.
Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricciarelli Pistacchio or Ricciarelli di Siena IGP?
Overall, Ricciarelli Pistacchio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricciarelli di Siena IGP has fewer calories: 459 kcal versus 476 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricciarelli Pistacchio has less sugar: 45 g versus 49 g per 100 g.