Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli Pistacchio
Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricciarelli | Ricciarelli Pistacchio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 420 kcal | 476 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 41 g | 45 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 7.9 g |
| Protein | 9.2 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricciarelli has 12% fewer calories (420 kcal vs 476 kcal).
- Ricciarelli has 46% less fat (13 g vs 24 g).
- Ricciarelli has 55% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 2 g).
- Only Ricciarelli Pistacchio lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Ricciarelli
Not available.
Ricciarelli Pistacchio
Zucchero, mandorle 34%, pistacchio tostato 11%, zucchero a velo 7% (zucchero, amido di mais), fibra solubile di dicoria, albume d'uovа fresche pastorizzate da allevamento a terra, aromi, conservante: acido sorbico, agente lievitante: carbonato acido di ammonio, sale. Può contenere frumento, latte, soia e altra frutta a guscio.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricciarelli or Ricciarelli Pistacchio?
Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricciarelli has fewer calories: 420 kcal versus 476 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricciarelli has less sugar: 41 g versus 45 g per 100 g.