Comparison
Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli
Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricciarelli | Ricciarelli |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 420 kcal | 478 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 25.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 41 g | 45.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 5.1 g |
| Protein | 9.2 g | 12.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricciarelli has 12% fewer calories (420 kcal vs 478 kcal).
- Ricciarelli has 50% less fat (13 g vs 25.8 g).
- Ricciarelli has 59% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 2.2 g).
- Ricciarelli has 26% more protein (12.4 g vs 9.2 g).
Ingredients
Ricciarelli
Not available.
Ricciarelli
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricciarelli or Ricciarelli?
Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricciarelli has fewer calories: 420 kcal versus 478 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricciarelli has less sugar: 41 g versus 45.4 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli Pistacchio
Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli Pistacchio
Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli alla mandorl...
Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli di siena
Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli Mandorla