Ricciarelli Mandorla vs Ricciarelli di siena
Overall, Ricciarelli Mandorla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricciarelli Mandorla | Ricciarelli di siena |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 452 kcal | 464 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 3.7 g |
| Sugars | 51 g | 51 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.6 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 9.3 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Nuts | Eggs, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricciarelli Mandorla has 51% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 3.7 g).
- Ricciarelli Mandorla has 100% more fiber (6.6 g vs 0 g).
- Ricciarelli Mandorla has the better Nutri-Score.
- Ricciarelli di siena is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Ricciarelli Mandorla
Zucchero - mandorle 40% - zucchero a velo 7% (zucchero, amido di mais) - fibra solubile di cicoria - albume d'uovo - aromi - conservante: acido sorbico - agente lievitante: carbonato acido di ammonio - sale.
Ricciarelli di siena
Mandorle 45%, Zucchero, Albume d'Uovo, Miele, Agente Lievitante (Carbonato acido d'Ammonio), Conservante: Acido Sorbico.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricciarelli Mandorla or Ricciarelli di siena?
Overall, Ricciarelli Mandorla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricciarelli Mandorla has fewer calories: 452 kcal versus 464 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricciarelli Mandorla has less sugar: 51 g versus 51 g per 100 g.