Relleno de empanadilla vs Col rizada kale sin sal
Overall, Col rizada kale sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Relleno de empanadilla | Col rizada kale sin sal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 126 kcal | 25 kcal |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 5.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 3.2 g |
| Protein | 5.1 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Ausencia |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Col rizada kale sin sal has 80% fewer calories (25 kcal vs 126 kcal).
- Col rizada kale sin sal has no fat, while Relleno de empanadilla has 7.1 g.
- Col rizada kale sin sal has no saturated fat, while Relleno de empanadilla has 0.7 g.
- Col rizada kale sin sal has no sugar, while Relleno de empanadilla has 5.5 g.
- Col rizada kale sin sal has 92% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Col rizada kale sin sal has 31% more fiber (3.2 g vs 2.2 g).
- Relleno de empanadilla has 59% more protein (5.1 g vs 2.1 g).
- Col rizada kale sin sal has the better Nutri-Score.
- Col rizada kale sin sal is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Relleno de empanadilla lists: Fish.
- Only Col rizada kale sin sal lists: Ausencia.
Ingredients
Relleno de empanadilla
Tomate, pimiento, tomate concentrado, atún (5%), caballa (5%), azúcar, aceite de olive virgen extra (2%), sal, aceite de girasol, espesantes: almidón modificado de maíz y goma garrofín, acidulante: ácido cítrico.
Col rizada kale sin sal
Col rizada, agua y antioxidante: ácido ascórbico.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Relleno de empanadilla or Col rizada kale sin sal?
Overall, Col rizada kale sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Col rizada kale sin sal has fewer calories: 25 kcal versus 126 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Col rizada kale sin sal has less sugar: 0 g versus 5.5 g per 100 g.