Comparison

Ensalada de codorniz vs Col rizada kale sin sal

Overall, Col rizada kale sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEnsalada de codornizCol rizada kale sin sal
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 87 kcal 25 kcal
Fat 1.7 g 0 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 3.2 g
Protein 16 g 2.1 g
Additives00
AllergensAusenciaAusencia

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Col rizada kale sin sal has 71% fewer calories (25 kcal vs 87 kcal).
  • Col rizada kale sin sal has no fat, while Ensalada de codorniz has 1.7 g.
  • Col rizada kale sin sal has no saturated fat, while Ensalada de codorniz has 1.3 g.
  • Col rizada kale sin sal has 89% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Col rizada kale sin sal has 100% more fiber (3.2 g vs 0 g).
  • Ensalada de codorniz has 87% more protein (16 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Col rizada kale sin sal is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Ensalada de codorniz

Carne de codorniz deshuesada (50%), agua, vinagre, aceite de oliva virgen extra(4%), ajo, sal, y especias (pimienta, clavo y laurel).

Col rizada kale sin sal

Col rizada, agua y antioxidante: ácido ascórbico.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ensalada de codorniz or Col rizada kale sin sal?

Overall, Col rizada kale sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Col rizada kale sin sal has fewer calories: 25 kcal versus 87 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ensalada de codorniz has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons