Comparison

Reduced Fat Milk vs Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel

Overall, Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientReduced Fat MilkBio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 54 kcal 137 kcal
Fat 2.1 g 6.3 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 1.8 g
Sugars 4.6 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 3.3 g 20 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedChicken

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Reduced Fat Milk has 60% fewer calories (54 kcal vs 137 kcal).
  • Reduced Fat Milk has 67% less fat (2.1 g vs 6.3 g).
  • Reduced Fat Milk has 31% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has no sugar, while Reduced Fat Milk has 4.6 g.
  • Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has 83% more protein (20 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel lists: Chicken.

Ingredients

Reduced Fat Milk

Organic grade a reduced fat milk, vitamin a palmitate, vitamin d3.

Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel

Chicken

FAQ

Which is healthier: Reduced Fat Milk or Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel?

Overall, Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Reduced Fat Milk has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 137 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons