Reduced Fat Milk vs Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel
Overall, Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Reduced Fat Milk | Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 137 kcal |
| Fat | 2.1 g | 6.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 4.6 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Chicken |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Reduced Fat Milk has 60% fewer calories (54 kcal vs 137 kcal).
- Reduced Fat Milk has 67% less fat (2.1 g vs 6.3 g).
- Reduced Fat Milk has 31% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has no sugar, while Reduced Fat Milk has 4.6 g.
- Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has 83% more protein (20 g vs 3.3 g).
- Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel lists: Chicken.
Ingredients
Reduced Fat Milk
Organic grade a reduced fat milk, vitamin a palmitate, vitamin d3.
Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel
Chicken
FAQ
Which is healthier: Reduced Fat Milk or Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel?
Overall, Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Reduced Fat Milk has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 137 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.