Red cabbage vs Col troceada
Overall, Col troceada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Red cabbage | Col troceada |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 61 kcal | 16 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 13 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Col troceada has 74% fewer calories (16 kcal vs 61 kcal).
- Col troceada has 91% less sugar (1.2 g vs 13 g).
- Col troceada has no salt, while Red cabbage has 1.4 g.
- Red cabbage has 32% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1.5 g).
- Col troceada has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Col troceada lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Red cabbage
chou rouge 77,7%, sucre, eau, pommes, sel, vinaigre d'alcool, épices,
Col troceada
col (repollo), agua, sal y antioxidante: E-223. Contiene sulfitos.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Red cabbage or Col troceada?
Overall, Col troceada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Col troceada has fewer calories: 16 kcal versus 61 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Col troceada has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 13 g per 100 g.