Rallado de mar vs Filetes De Caballa En Aceite Isabel
Overall, Filetes De Caballa En Aceite Isabel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rallado de mar | Filetes De Caballa En Aceite... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 188 kcal | 204 kcal |
| Fat | 13.6 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 8.8 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filetes De Caballa En Aceite Isabel has 12% less fat (12 g vs 13.6 g).
- Rallado de mar has 48% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.5 g).
- Filetes De Caballa En Aceite Isabel has no sugar, while Rallado de mar has 1.2 g.
- Filetes De Caballa En Aceite Isabel has 25% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Filetes De Caballa En Aceite Isabel has 63% more protein (24 g vs 8.8 g).
- Filetes De Caballa En Aceite Isabel has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rallado de mar
Not available.
Filetes De Caballa En Aceite Isabel
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rallado de mar or Filetes De Caballa En Aceite Isabel?
Overall, Filetes De Caballa En Aceite Isabel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rallado de mar has fewer calories: 188 kcal versus 204 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filetes De Caballa En Aceite Isabel has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.