Comparison
Filetes De Caballa En Aceite Isabel vs Atún
Overall, Atún has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filetes De Caballa En Aceite... | Atún |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 204 kcal | 186 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Atún has 25% less fat (9 g vs 12 g).
- Atún has 60% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.5 g).
- Atún has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Filetes De Caballa En Aceite Isabel
Not available.
Atún
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filetes De Caballa En Aceite Isabel or Atún?
Overall, Atún has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Atún has fewer calories: 186 kcal versus 204 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filetes De Caballa En Aceite Isabel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.