Puré de plátano y fresa vs Cuatro frutas con avena
Overall, Cuatro frutas con avena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Puré de plátano y fresa
Cuatro frutas con avena
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Puré de plátano y fresa | Cuatro frutas con avena |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 79 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 15 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 2.6 g |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Avena |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Puré de plátano y fresa has 10% fewer calories (71 kcal vs 79 kcal).
- Puré de plátano y fresa has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Cuatro frutas con avena has 20% less sugar (12 g vs 15 g).
- Cuatro frutas con avena has 69% more fiber (2.6 g vs 0.8 g).
- Cuatro frutas con avena has 27% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.8 g).
- Only Cuatro frutas con avena lists: Gluten, Avena.
Ingredients
Puré de plátano y fresa
Puré de banana (63,4%), puré de morango (34,4%), suco de limão, puré de cenoura roxa (0,92%), antioxidante (ácido ascórbico).
Cuatro frutas con avena
Puré de manzana 37%, puré de plátano 36%, zumo de naranja 13%, zumo de mandarina 6%, harina de _avena_ 3%, zumo de limón, oligofructosa, harina integral de arroz 1%, aroma natural, vitamina C (ácido L-ascórbico).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Puré de plátano y fresa or Cuatro frutas con avena?
Overall, Cuatro frutas con avena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Puré de plátano y fresa has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 79 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cuatro frutas con avena has less sugar: 12 g versus 15 g per 100 g.