Comparison

Pulpa Pierna vs Angus steak burger

Overall, Pulpa Pierna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPulpa PiernaAngus steak burger
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 120 kcal 244 kcal
Fat 4 g 19 g
Saturated fat 1.4 g 8.6 g
Sugars 0 g 0.6 g
Salt 0 g 1.1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 20 g 16 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pulpa Pierna has 51% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 244 kcal).
  • Pulpa Pierna has 79% less fat (4 g vs 19 g).
  • Pulpa Pierna has 84% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 8.6 g).
  • Pulpa Pierna has no sugar, while Angus steak burger has 0.6 g.
  • Pulpa Pierna has no salt, while Angus steak burger has 1.1 g.
  • Pulpa Pierna has 20% more protein (20 g vs 16 g).
  • Pulpa Pierna has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Pulpa Pierna

Carne de cerdo.

Angus steak burger

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pulpa Pierna or Angus steak burger?

Overall, Pulpa Pierna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pulpa Pierna has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 244 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pulpa Pierna has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons