Pulpa Pierna vs Angus steak burger
Overall, Pulpa Pierna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pulpa Pierna | Angus steak burger |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 120 kcal | 244 kcal |
| Fat | 4 g | 19 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 8.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 20 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pulpa Pierna has 51% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 244 kcal).
- Pulpa Pierna has 79% less fat (4 g vs 19 g).
- Pulpa Pierna has 84% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 8.6 g).
- Pulpa Pierna has no sugar, while Angus steak burger has 0.6 g.
- Pulpa Pierna has no salt, while Angus steak burger has 1.1 g.
- Pulpa Pierna has 20% more protein (20 g vs 16 g).
- Pulpa Pierna has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pulpa Pierna
Carne de cerdo.
Angus steak burger
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pulpa Pierna or Angus steak burger?
Overall, Pulpa Pierna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pulpa Pierna has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 244 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pulpa Pierna has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.