Comparison
Prunes vs Bifudus 0
Overall, Bifudus 0 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Prunes | Bifudus 0 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 240 kcal | 45 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 37.5 g | 5.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 7.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 4.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bifudus 0 has 81% fewer calories (45 kcal vs 240 kcal).
- Bifudus 0 has 85% less sugar (5.5 g vs 37.5 g).
- Prunes has 85% more fiber (7.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Bifudus 0 has 44% more protein (4.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Bifudus 0 has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Prunes
Dried Plums, potassium sorbate
Bifudus 0
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Prunes or Bifudus 0?
Overall, Bifudus 0 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bifudus 0 has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bifudus 0 has less sugar: 5.5 g versus 37.5 g per 100 g.