Bifudus 0 vs Biactive con ciruelas
Overall, Bifudus 0 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bifudus 0 | Biactive con ciruelas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 45 kcal | 90 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 5.5 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 4.5 g | 3.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bifudus 0 has 50% fewer calories (45 kcal vs 90 kcal).
- Bifudus 0 has 95% less fat (0.1 g vs 2 g).
- Bifudus 0 has 93% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Bifudus 0 has 54% less sugar (5.5 g vs 12 g).
- Bifudus 0 has 100% more fiber (1.1 g vs 0 g).
- Bifudus 0 has 18% more protein (4.5 g vs 3.7 g).
- Bifudus 0 has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bifudus 0
Not available.
Biactive con ciruelas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bifudus 0 or Biactive con ciruelas?
Overall, Bifudus 0 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bifudus 0 has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 90 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bifudus 0 has less sugar: 5.5 g versus 12 g per 100 g.