Prunes vs Biactive con ciruelas
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Prunes | Biactive con ciruelas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 240 kcal | 90 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 37.5 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 7.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 3.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Biactive con ciruelas has 63% fewer calories (90 kcal vs 240 kcal).
- Prunes has no fat, while Biactive con ciruelas has 2 g.
- Prunes has no saturated fat, while Biactive con ciruelas has 1.4 g.
- Biactive con ciruelas has 68% less sugar (12 g vs 37.5 g).
- Prunes has 100% more fiber (7.5 g vs 0 g).
- Biactive con ciruelas has 32% more protein (3.7 g vs 2.5 g).
Ingredients
Prunes
Dried Plums, potassium sorbate
Biactive con ciruelas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Prunes or Biactive con ciruelas?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Biactive con ciruelas has fewer calories: 90 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Biactive con ciruelas has less sugar: 12 g versus 37.5 g per 100 g.