Comparison

Proper chips vs Protein Chips Sweet Paprika

Overall, Protein Chips Sweet Paprika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientProper chipsProtein Chips Sweet Paprika
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 482 kcal 393 kcal
Fat 21.6 g 9 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 1.1 g
Sugars 0.7 g 5.1 g
Salt 1.6 g 1.1 g
Fiber 2.6 g 0.9 g
Protein 10 g 26 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Protein Chips Sweet Paprika has 18% fewer calories (393 kcal vs 482 kcal).
  • Protein Chips Sweet Paprika has 58% less fat (9 g vs 21.6 g).
  • Protein Chips Sweet Paprika has 32% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Proper chips has 87% less sugar (0.7 g vs 5.1 g).
  • Protein Chips Sweet Paprika has 33% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Proper chips has 65% more fiber (2.6 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Protein Chips Sweet Paprika has 62% more protein (26 g vs 10 g).

Ingredients

Proper chips

Lentil flour (30%), potato starch, corn flour, vegetable oils (rapeseed, sunflower), sea salt, salt. Allergen info: May contain soya. Packaged in a protective atmosphere.

Protein Chips Sweet Paprika

32% Erbsenprotein 20% Linsenmehl Kartoffel Reismehl Gewürzzubereitung Dextrose Maltodextrin Paprikapulver Zwiebelpulver Chilipulver Kurkumapulver Speisesalz Zucker natürliches Aroma Säureregulator Natriumacetat Hefeextrakt Raucharoma Sonnenblumenöl

FAQ

Which is healthier: Proper chips or Protein Chips Sweet Paprika?

Overall, Protein Chips Sweet Paprika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Protein Chips Sweet Paprika has fewer calories: 393 kcal versus 482 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Proper chips has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 5.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons