Comparison
Premium wasabi paste in tube vs Wasabi
Overall, Wasabi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Premium wasabi paste in tube | Wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 321 kcal | 166 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 10.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 7.6 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wasabi has 48% fewer calories (166 kcal vs 321 kcal).
- Wasabi has 28% less fat (10.1 g vs 14 g).
- Premium wasabi paste in tube has no saturated fat, while Wasabi has 1.3 g.
- Premium wasabi paste in tube has no sugar, while Wasabi has 4.5 g.
- Wasabi has 61% less salt (3 g vs 7.6 g).
- Wasabi has 54% more protein (3.5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Wasabi has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Premium wasabi paste in tube
Wasabi, Food starch modified, Sorbitol, Sugar, Rice bran oil, Salt, Water, Natural flavor, Citric acid, Xanthan gum
Wasabi
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Premium wasabi paste in tube or Wasabi?
Overall, Wasabi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wasabi has fewer calories: 166 kcal versus 321 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Premium wasabi paste in tube has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.