Premium wasabi paste in tube vs Pate de wasabi
Overall, Premium wasabi paste in tube has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Premium wasabi paste in tube | Pate de wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 321 kcal | 300 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 7.6 g | 7.4 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Premium wasabi paste in tube has no saturated fat, while Pate de wasabi has 1.9 g.
- Premium wasabi paste in tube has no sugar, while Pate de wasabi has 0.8 g.
- Premium wasabi paste in tube has 56% more protein (1.6 g vs 0.7 g).
Ingredients
Premium wasabi paste in tube
Wasabi, Food starch modified, Sorbitol, Sugar, Rice bran oil, Salt, Water, Natural flavor, Citric acid, Xanthan gum
Pate de wasabi
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Premium wasabi paste in tube or Pate de wasabi?
Overall, Premium wasabi paste in tube has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate de wasabi has fewer calories: 300 kcal versus 321 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Premium wasabi paste in tube has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.