Pate de wasabi vs Wasabi
Overall, Wasabi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate de wasabi | Wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 300 kcal | 255 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 9.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 2.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 8.2 g |
| Salt | 7.4 g | 5.8 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 3.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wasabi has 15% fewer calories (255 kcal vs 300 kcal).
- Wasabi has 29% less fat (9.2 g vs 13 g).
- Pate de wasabi has 34% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 2.9 g).
- Pate de wasabi has 90% less sugar (0.8 g vs 8.2 g).
- Wasabi has 22% less salt (5.8 g vs 7.4 g).
- Wasabi has 82% more protein (3.8 g vs 0.7 g).
- Only Wasabi lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Pate de wasabi
Not available.
Wasabi
Polvere di rafano 33%, Umidificante: E420, Olio di mais, Acqua, Wasabia japonica 7.2%, Sale, Addensante: E1442, Estratto di senape, Acidificante: E330, Curcuma in polvere, Addensante: E415, Colorante: E133.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate de wasabi or Wasabi?
Overall, Wasabi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wasabi has fewer calories: 255 kcal versus 300 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate de wasabi has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 8.2 g per 100 g.