Pate de wasabi vs Wasabi
Overall, Pate de wasabi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate de wasabi | Wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 300 kcal | 321 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 7.4 g | 7.6 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 1.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate de wasabi has 30% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 2.7 g).
- Pate de wasabi has 78% less sugar (0.8 g vs 3.6 g).
- Wasabi has 56% more protein (1.6 g vs 0.7 g).
- Only Wasabi lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Pate de wasabi
Not available.
Wasabi
horseradish 31,7%, humectant: E420, rice bran oil, salt, dextrin, wasabi japonica 4,5%, potato starch, water, flavouring, turmeric, thickener: E415, acid: E330, colour: E133.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate de wasabi or Wasabi?
Overall, Pate de wasabi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate de wasabi has fewer calories: 300 kcal versus 321 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate de wasabi has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.