Comparison
Pate de wasabi vs Wasabi
Overall, Wasabi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate de wasabi | Wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 300 kcal | 166 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 10.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 7.4 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wasabi has 45% fewer calories (166 kcal vs 300 kcal).
- Wasabi has 22% less fat (10.1 g vs 13 g).
- Wasabi has 32% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 1.9 g).
- Pate de wasabi has 82% less sugar (0.8 g vs 4.5 g).
- Wasabi has 59% less salt (3 g vs 7.4 g).
- Wasabi has 80% more protein (3.5 g vs 0.7 g).
- Wasabi has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pate de wasabi
Not available.
Wasabi
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate de wasabi or Wasabi?
Overall, Wasabi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wasabi has fewer calories: 166 kcal versus 300 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate de wasabi has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.