Pâte de wasabi vs Pate de wasabi
Overall, Pate de wasabi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pâte de wasabi | Pate de wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 356 kcal | 300 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 7.8 g | 7.4 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | — |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate de wasabi has 16% fewer calories (300 kcal vs 356 kcal).
- Pate de wasabi has 30% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 2.7 g).
- Pate de wasabi has 47% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Pâte de wasabi has 61% more protein (1.8 g vs 0.7 g).
- Only Pâte de wasabi lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Pâte de wasabi
Poudre de raifort 32%, tréhalose*, huile de tournesol, eau, amidon de maïs, sel, maltodextrine, poudre de wasabi 1,6%, huile de _moutarde_, curcuma, épaississant : gomme xanthane, colorant : complexes cuivre-chlorophylles et cuivre-chlorophyllines. *le tréhalose est une source de glucose. Peut contenir des traces de soja.
Pate de wasabi
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pâte de wasabi or Pate de wasabi?
Overall, Pate de wasabi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate de wasabi has fewer calories: 300 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate de wasabi has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.