Poulpe à la galicienne vs Patas de pulpo cocido
Overall, Patas de pulpo cocido has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Poulpe à la galicienne
Patas de pulpo cocido
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Poulpe à la galicienne | Patas de pulpo cocido |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 79 kcal | 75 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Patas de pulpo cocido has no sugar, while Poulpe à la galicienne has 1.2 g.
- Patas de pulpo cocido has 59% more protein (17 g vs 7 g).
- Patas de pulpo cocido has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Patas de pulpo cocido lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Poulpe à la galicienne
Not available.
Patas de pulpo cocido
Pulpo (Octopus vulgaris) (moluscos). Puede contener pescado y/o crustáceos. LISTO PARA CONSUMIR.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Poulpe à la galicienne or Patas de pulpo cocido?
Overall, Patas de pulpo cocido has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Patas de pulpo cocido has fewer calories: 75 kcal versus 79 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Patas de pulpo cocido has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.