Comparison

Poulpe à la galicienne vs Chico Miko

Overall, Poulpe à la galicienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPoulpe à la galicienneChico Miko
Nutri-Score b e
NOVA group — —
Calories 79 kcal 489 kcal
Fat 0.7 g 23.6 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 13.1 g
Sugars 1.2 g 36.9 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.6 g
Fiber — 2.3 g
Protein 7 g 6.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Poulpe à la galicienne has 84% fewer calories (79 kcal vs 489 kcal).
  • Poulpe à la galicienne has 97% less fat (0.7 g vs 23.6 g).
  • Poulpe à la galicienne has 98% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 13.1 g).
  • Poulpe à la galicienne has 97% less sugar (1.2 g vs 36.9 g).
  • Poulpe à la galicienne has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Poulpe à la galicienne

Not available.

Chico Miko

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Poulpe à la galicienne or Chico Miko?

Overall, Poulpe à la galicienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Poulpe à la galicienne has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 489 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Poulpe à la galicienne has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 36.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons