Cocktail de fruits de mer vs Chico Miko
Overall, Cocktail de fruits de mer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cocktail de fruits de mer | Chico Miko |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 72 kcal | 489 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 23.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 13.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 36.9 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.3 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 6.8 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans, Molluscs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cocktail de fruits de mer has 85% fewer calories (72 kcal vs 489 kcal).
- Cocktail de fruits de mer has 95% less fat (1.1 g vs 23.6 g).
- Cocktail de fruits de mer has 98% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 13.1 g).
- Cocktail de fruits de mer has no sugar, while Chico Miko has 36.9 g.
- Chico Miko has 41% less salt (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Chico Miko has 100% more fiber (2.3 g vs 0 g).
- Cocktail de fruits de mer has 51% more protein (14 g vs 6.8 g).
- Cocktail de fruits de mer has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Cocktail de fruits de mer lists: Crustaceans, Molluscs.
Ingredients
Cocktail de fruits de mer
32% moule décocvillée cuite (moule du Pacifique (A*) ou moule (B*)), 28% morceaux d'encornet (en cornet géant blanchi, eau, stabilisants: diphosphates, triphospahtes, polyphosphates; sel (C*)) ou encornet blanchi ((D*) ou (E*)), eau, sel, correcteurs d'acidité acide citrique, citrates de sodium), 20% tronçons et pointes d'encornet géant blanchi (encornet géant, eau, correcteurs d'acidité: acide citrique, citrates de sodium, carbonates de sodium; sel (F*)) ou têtes et pattes d'encornet blanchi (encornet ((G*) ou (H*)), eau, sel, correcteurs d'acidité: acide citrique, citrates de sodium), 20% crevette décortiquée blanchie (crevette, eau, sel, colorant: extrait de paprika ; correcteurs d'acidité : acide citrique, citrates de sodium; eau, sel). Traces éventuelles de poissons et de sulfites. Malgré tout le soin apporté, il peut subsister des morceaux de coquilles.
Chico Miko
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cocktail de fruits de mer or Chico Miko?
Overall, Cocktail de fruits de mer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cocktail de fruits de mer has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 489 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cocktail de fruits de mer has less sugar: 0 g versus 36.9 g per 100 g.