Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo vs Chico Miko
Overall, Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo | Chico Miko |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 295 kcal | 489 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 23.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 13.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 36.9 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.3 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 6.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Molluscs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo has 40% fewer calories (295 kcal vs 489 kcal).
- Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo has 78% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 13.1 g).
- Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo has 99% less sugar (0.5 g vs 36.9 g).
- Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo has 60% more protein (17 g vs 6.8 g).
- Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo
Tentáculos de potón del pacífico (molusco), aceite refinado de girasol, sal y aroma de ajo (0,3%).
Chico Miko
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo or Chico Miko?
Overall, Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo has fewer calories: 295 kcal versus 489 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 36.9 g per 100 g.