Comparison

Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo vs Patas de pulpo cocido

Overall, Patas de pulpo cocido has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTacos de Pota Al AjilloPatas de pulpo cocido
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 295 kcal 75 kcal
Fat 25 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 2.9 g 0.2 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.6 g
Protein 17 g 17 g
Additives00
AllergensMolluscsMolluscs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Patas de pulpo cocido has 75% fewer calories (75 kcal vs 295 kcal).
  • Patas de pulpo cocido has 97% less fat (0.8 g vs 25 g).
  • Patas de pulpo cocido has 93% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Patas de pulpo cocido has no sugar, while Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo has 0.5 g.
  • Patas de pulpo cocido has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Patas de pulpo cocido is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo

Tentáculos de potón del pacífico (molusco), aceite refinado de girasol, sal y aroma de ajo (0,3%).

Patas de pulpo cocido

Pulpo (Octopus vulgaris) (moluscos). Puede contener pescado y/o crustáceos. LISTO PARA CONSUMIR.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tacos de Pota Al Ajillo or Patas de pulpo cocido?

Overall, Patas de pulpo cocido has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Patas de pulpo cocido has fewer calories: 75 kcal versus 295 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Patas de pulpo cocido has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons