Poker Nocciola vs Mila
Overall, Mila has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Poker Nocciola | Mila |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 517 kcal | 547 kcal |
| Fat | 26.3 g | 36 g |
| Saturated fat | 23.8 g | 25 g |
| Sugars | 37.8 g | 34 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 3 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Poker Nocciola has 27% less fat (26.3 g vs 36 g).
- Mila has 10% less sugar (34 g vs 37.8 g).
- Mila has 25% more protein (8 g vs 6 g).
- Only Poker Nocciola lists: Nuts.
- Only Mila lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Poker Nocciola
Farina di grano tenero, zucchero, olio di cocco, siero di latte in polvere, cacao magro in polvere, pasta di nocciole (6% nella crema), emulsionanti: lecitina di soia, sale, agenti lievitanti: carbonato acido di sodio, estratto di vaniglia.
Mila
Palmen - und Kokosnuss-Pflanzenfett, Weizenmehl, Vollmilchpulver 17%, Zucker, Kakaobeschichtung 14% (Zucker, Palm - und Shea-Pflanzenfett, fettreduzierter Kakao 17%, Molkepulver, Emulgator E442 und E476, Aroma), Sojamehl, fettarmes Milchpulver, Alkohol 0,5%, Maisstärke, Sonnenblumenöl, Emulgator (Lecithine), Aromen, Triebmittel (Natriumkarbonate), Eigelbpulver. Kann Erdnüsse und Nüsse enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Poker Nocciola or Mila?
Overall, Mila has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Poker Nocciola has fewer calories: 517 kcal versus 547 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mila has less sugar: 34 g versus 37.8 g per 100 g.