Comparison

Mila vs Horalky Vanille

Overall, Horalky Vanille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMilaHoralky Vanille
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 547 kcal 541 kcal
Fat 36 g 33 g
Saturated fat 25 g 19 g
Sugars 34 g 33 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 3 g 4 g
Protein 8 g 8 g
Additives33
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, SoybeansEggs, Gluten, Milk, Peanuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Horalky Vanille has 24% less saturated fat (19 g vs 25 g).
  • Horalky Vanille has 25% more fiber (4 g vs 3 g).
  • Only Horalky Vanille lists: Peanuts.

Ingredients

Mila

Palmen - und Kokosnuss-Pflanzenfett, Weizenmehl, Vollmilchpulver 17%, Zucker, Kakaobeschichtung 14% (Zucker, Palm - und Shea-Pflanzenfett, fettreduzierter Kakao 17%, Molkepulver, Emulgator E442 und E476, Aroma), Sojamehl, fettarmes Milchpulver, Alkohol 0,5%, Maisstärke, Sonnenblumenöl, Emulgator (Lecithine), Aromen, Triebmittel (Natriumkarbonate), Eigelbpulver. Kann Erdnüsse und Nüsse enthalten.

Horalky Vanille

Weizenmehl, Palm - und Kokosnuss-Pflanzenfett, Zucker, geröstete Erdnüsse 8%, Kakaobeschichtung 7,5% (Zucker, Palm - und Shea-Pflanzenfett, fettreduzierter Kakao 17%, Molkepulver, Emulgator E442 und E476, Aroma), Maisstärke, Molkepulver, Sojamehl, fettarmer Kakao, Vollmilchpulver, Sonnenblumenöl, Emulgator (Lecithine), Triebmittel (Natriumkarbonate), Eigelbpulver, Aroma. Kann Nüsse enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mila or Horalky Vanille?

Overall, Horalky Vanille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Horalky Vanille has fewer calories: 541 kcal versus 547 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Horalky Vanille has less sugar: 33 g versus 34 g per 100 g.

More comparisons