Comparison

Ploughman's plum chutney vs Original Recipe Chutney Blatjang

Overall, Ploughman's plum chutney has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPloughman's plum chutneyOriginal Recipe Chutney Blat...
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 137 kcal 185 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0 g
Sugars 25.2 g 34.5 g
Salt 1 g 1 g
Fiber 0.8 g 1 g
Protein 0.9 g 0.8 g
Additives02
AllergensApple, GlutenSulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ploughman's plum chutney has 26% fewer calories (137 kcal vs 185 kcal).
  • Original Recipe Chutney Blatjang has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Ploughman's plum chutney has 27% less sugar (25.2 g vs 34.5 g).
  • Ploughman's plum chutney has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Ploughman's plum chutney is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Ploughman's plum chutney lists: Apple, Gluten.
  • Only Original Recipe Chutney Blatjang lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Ploughman's plum chutney

Plums (36%), sugar, apples, barley malt vinegar, water, onion, cornflower, sultanas, salt, plum juice from concentrate (1%), garlic powder, ginger powder

Original Recipe Chutney Blatjang

Sugar, water, vinegar, dried fruit (peaches (6.9%), apricot/0.95%) sulphur dioxide)], modified maize starch, salt, caramel colouring, chilli (irradiated).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ploughman's plum chutney or Original Recipe Chutney Blatjang?

Overall, Ploughman's plum chutney has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ploughman's plum chutney has fewer calories: 137 kcal versus 185 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ploughman's plum chutney has less sugar: 25.2 g versus 34.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons