Comparison

Pleurotes en Abalones vs Oesterzwammen

Overall, Oesterzwammen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPleurotes en AbalonesOesterzwammen
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 15 kcal 46 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.4 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0 g 1.1 g
Salt 1 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 2.3 g
Protein 1.2 g 3.3 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pleurotes en Abalones has 67% fewer calories (15 kcal vs 46 kcal).
  • Pleurotes en Abalones has no fat, while Oesterzwammen has 0.4 g.
  • Pleurotes en Abalones has no sugar, while Oesterzwammen has 1.1 g.
  • Oesterzwammen has 95% less salt (0.1 g vs 1 g).
  • Oesterzwammen has 64% more protein (3.3 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Oesterzwammen has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Oesterzwammen is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Pleurotes en Abalones

PLEUROTES EN ABALONE (PLEUROTUS ABALONE 53,4%, EAU, SEL, CORRECTEUR D'ACIDITE (E330

Oesterzwammen

Oesterzwammen

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pleurotes en Abalones or Oesterzwammen?

Overall, Oesterzwammen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pleurotes en Abalones has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pleurotes en Abalones has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons